Trac & Git

February 28th, 2008

For quite some time now, I’ve been running Trac over at software.complete.org. Most of my free software projects — well, the ones where I actually go to the effort to make formal releases — have a Trac instance. This Trac instance provides a wiki, bug tracker, downloads area, timeline (with RSS feeds), and VCS integration.

Trac is a nice program, but one thing has bugged me about it all this time:

Every trac instance is its own island.

I have 17 trac instances out there for my projects. To see what bugs are out there on my own server, I have to check 17 websites (or 17 RSS feeds or whatnot). Publishing a new program is not a lightweight process.

So today I started poking around looking for something better. I really like Trac’s way of integrating the wiki with the BTS and the commits; wiki markup can refer to a bug or a changeset, and bugs can use wiki markup too.

I looked at Redmine, Mantis, and Roundup, and I also have experience with RT.

Of these, Redmine looks the most interesting. Multiple projects support, per project wiki and forums, gantt charting even, and support for SVN, CVS, Mercurial, Bazaar, and Darcs — with Git support out there as patches to their development tree already too. Oh, and I saw references to a Trac importer as well. One thing that makes me nervous, though, is that they have no links to sites that use Redmine (except one in the news section), and Google isn’t turning up users either. Does nobody use this thing?

What else should I be looking at?

Over on the Git side, I’m still liking Git. I have now migrated several Mercurial projects over to git (see git.complete.org). I am also playing with Darcs to git migration using darcs2git, which also is going well. Sometimes gitk shows a nicer representation of a Git repo converted from Darcs than I was able to get from Darcs.

Categories: Programming

Tags: , , Leave a comment

Comments Feed22 Comments

  1. thekaos

    Hi John, AFAIK, trac over git repositories is really bad. I thought you were going to talk about this issue when I was post’s title.

    This is keeping me from migrating fully to git.

    By the way, multiple project support for trac is coming soon, anyways for planning purposes I think having a global trac is a bad idea.

    Reply

    John Goerzen Reply:

    I’m trying it out right now with the GitPlugin, and so far it is working quite well. I haven’t done anything too stressful on it yet though.

    Reply

  2. John

    Yes, trac has had several proposals floating around for a long time now about multiple projects and how all that will work. Looks like things are finally shaping for a future release… see

    [url]http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/MultipleRepositorySupport[/url]

    [url]http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.trac.devel/3162[/url]

    Reply

    John Goerzen Reply:

    Well, yes I am aware of the “coming soon” noises. But as far as I can tell, it’s still vaporware.

    That particular page is actually different from what I’m talking about. On that page, there is support for more than one repo per project. What I want is a way to see bugs that are set up across all projects.

    Reply

  3. Paul Tötterman

    http://ikiwiki.info/tips/integrated_issue_tracking_with_ikiwiki/

    Reply

  4. Jeff Balogh

    You might try [url=https://www.drproject.org/DrProject]DrProject[/url]. It was forked from Trac a few years ago by some folks at the University of Toronto to make it easy to manage student projects.

    It’s targeted for classroom use, so some of the interfaces have been simplified, e.g. no Component, Version, CC: fields on tickets.

    It only supports svn right now, but I got the TracGit plugin working without too much trouble.

    Reply

    Anonymous Reply:

    I’m another happy drproject converted (from trac), and considering a Mercurial backend

    Reply

  5. Jan Hudec

    Ah, those Ruby people, who seemingly never heard of Freshmeat. No wonder noone uses Redmine — potential users rarely look for general applications at rubyforge.

    Besides they made very bad first impression to me by being translated (I have Accept-Language: cs, en), but failing to do it properly. They get plural forms wrong (Czech has plural=(n == 1) ? 0 : (n >= 2 && n <= 4) ? 1 : 2) and many translations simply don’t fit in the context (either by gramatical form or even using wrong synonym).

    Ok, that’s not the most important feature, right. However, it does not seem to support ticket dependencies and subtickets, which is biggest limitation of Trac we hit at dayjob.

    Besides for opensource projects I really hate systems that require me to register to report a bug. This is one thing that Trac handles extremely nicely.

    Reply

  6. Lloeki

    maybe flyspray? (sample at bugs.archlinux.org)

    Reply

  7. Jakob Petsovits

    Drupal [1] with a set of extension modules is maybe something to consider. Or not… depends, plus I’m biased because I’m currently working on Drupal’s VCS integration.

    Last Summer of Code, I wrote the Version Control API [2] for Drupal, enabling multiple repositories in multiple version control systems to go together on one site. What it currently does is providing commit logs (including RSS, of course), optionally including links to the affected project (when integrated with the Project module [3], which provides the issue tracker) and links to diffs and file contents (which needs to be on an external web app, like gitweb).

    Advantages:
    – Drupal is like lego: you can include wiki functionality, issue tracking, download areas, forums, …whatever you can think of, and combine it to your likings. If you like things being modular instead of the fixed-predefined-functionality approach, Drupal is for you.
    – The Project module and Version Control API are getting quite a bit of traction at the moment, healthy community, and stuff. And of course Drupal is one of the premier flagship web frameworks overall.
    – VCS backends for Git, Mercurial, Subversion and CVS currently exist. I guess a Bazaar backend will only be a matter of time.

    Disadvantages:
    – Version Control API is still a bit in flux, and the Git backend is also rather new (like, a month old – a GHOP task). One or two upgrades might not go completely automatic yet.
    – Some features like a repository viewer, diffs, or closing an issue automatically with commit messages are not yet implemented. Likewise, only CVS can do automated management and synchronization of your Drupal user with your VCS account currently.
    – No detailed view access permission system yet, it’s all or nothing atm.

    For more information on the version control related stuff that I did, you can have a look at http://groups.drupal.org/taxonomy/term/2408 – more general project management group discussions can be found at http://groups.drupal.org/issue-tracking-and-software-releases

    Have a look, and see if you like it :)

    [1] http://drupal.org/drupal-6.0
    [2] http://drupal.org/project/versioncontrol
    [3] http://drupal.org/project/project

    Reply

  8. carl nygard

    we use this at work to integrate bug tracking with the wiki and with the commit logs. Works reasonably nice. We’ve also patched insurrection to do the same as ViewVC, so I’m sure you can apply the concepts to roll your own quite quickly.

    http://oss.segetech.com/bugzilla-svn-wiki.html

    Reply

  9. Nikki

    I’m using redmine for my personal projects, it does the job, and it does it well.

    As for sites using redmine – redmine’s own site is all on redmine, so you were using it when you were checking their site.

    The mercurial integration very well done – its the DVCS I use – and makes things really easy.

    Reply

  10. John Edgar Varesel

    You may want to try Launchpad.

    Reply

  11. thekaos

    Ok, you seen to have small repositories. My trac is over the full gcc git repository, and is frankly unusable, we had to disable trac’s browser.

    However having a small repository does just makes the load manageable, but your apache will use lots of cpu compared to svn.

    GitPlugin people are well aware of the issue, which is a design defect, but it will take a lot to be fixed.

    Reply

  12. Vespe Savikko

    Have you considered just incorporating all your projects into one Trac project? Then the former projects could be just components under the big umbrella project. Naturally, there could be some showstoppers that I am not aware of.

    Reply

    John Goerzen Reply:

    Well, that gets unwieldy for a few reasons. One is that each project has its own repo, which Trac doesn’t necessarily grok. Another is that the file downloads area would be a mess. Finally, the wiki pages could clash, etc.

    Also it would not be possible to authorize someone to one project but not another.

    Reply

  13. The Changelog

    A few days ago, I discussed Trac and Redmine. Redmine is a project management tool, similar to Trac, with built-in download tools, bug tracking, etc.

    Redmine has a lot of nice features. Chief among them is better integration between multiple projects

    Reply

  14. yohoho

    About having to check multiple RSS feeds, why not just setup a planet that compiles them for you and then check that planet?

    trac has really flexible authentication: it relies on the web server’s authentication policies.
    So if you’ve configured apache reasonably, you should be able to have one login that would get you at all the different trac instances.

    For interlinking between trac instances, there’s a simple InterTrac
    wiki link syntax

    Integration isn’t so great, its true (for example how do you pull ticket reporting pages together so you can see a list of your highest-priority tickets, regardless of project)

    Reply

  15. SIlas Sewell

    Lighttpd now uses Redmine.

    http://redmine.lighttpd.net/

    Reply

  16. Amol Hatwar

    Just getting trac and git to work together has caused nightmares for my team, the development version especially. I am surprised to hear praises.

    On the other hand, it will be great if you could publish the ingredients of your trac+git magic sauce. (My team also hates SVN).

    Reply

  17. tdwebste

    Using trac, git plugin, gitosis is quite easy. The problem is it only supports one repository.

    I use debian, which correctly installs gitosis
    read the example.conf

    but debian’s trac git plugin was broken, build your own

    trac
    /conf/trac.ini
    [trac]
    repository_dir = /srv/gitosis/repositories/genist.git
    repository_type = git

    [git]
    cached_repository = true
    shortrev_len = 7
    persistent_cache = true
    git_bin = /usr/bin/git

    ping if you need help

    Reply

  18. Jeroen Knoops

    I had this problem on Debian (Lenny) as well.
    I also had to manually build it and added

    [components]
    gitplugin.* = enabled
    tracext.git.* = enabled

    and had to give www-data write access to the repositories.

    Reply

Leave a comment

 

Feed

http://changelog.complete.org / Trac & Git