Oops, had an HTML error in the alarm clock review. I’ve fixed it and it’s working now.
Sangean RCR-1 Alarm Clock
Some of you may remember my recent rant about alarm clocks. I finally decided to get a Sangean RCR-1 and the cheapest office-type UPS I could find for battery backup. It’s $80 via J&R or Amazon. The clock is somewhat unique in that it has both a digital and a true analog display, and it keeps the analog display synchronized with the digital one. Here’s my review.
First, the positives about this clock.
It has a very nice look. The “humane waking system” is also nice. When the alarm begins to ring, it starts quiet and changes the display color from blue to orange. It gradually gets louder. Very nice. If you press sleep, the display will stay orange; it will do that until you cancel the alarm. Also very nice.
The unit has two alarms. Each alarm may be set to beep or to tune to a specific radio station. There is an alarm volume control underneath the unit. Each alarm may be programmed to ring on certain days of the week only. That is very handy. I haven’t had to adjust an alarm setting since we got the unit.
There is also a nap timer, that is sort of a third alarm. The nap timer takes a number of minutes, from 10 to 120, from now. It will ring the alarm that many minutes from the time you set it. Handy for… naps.
The unit does have a shortwave radio receiver to automatically synchronize with the NIST atomic clock. The initial synchronization can take some time (30-60 minutes for me), but it has been completely reliable. It’s really fun to watch it synchronize the analog clock; the hands will go spinning and get to the right time in just a few seconds.
The radio is all digital and the sound quality is the best I’ve ever heard from an alarm clock.
The unit appears to have an internal battery backup that preserves time and settings for at least 30 minutes (that I tested). It will not ring the alarm when on battery, however.
The bad:
First, of course, not ringing the alarm when on battery. That’s why I got the UPS.
Second, the manual. It is intelligible, but it is obviously an English translation, and leaves out some details. For instance, there is a toggle switch that will adjust the display between full brightness and whatever brightness level is set with the knob on the underside of the unit.
Also, I’ve found my old alarm with its old-fashioned red LED numbers to be easier to read than any of the backlit LCD clocks out there, including this one. The analog clock is more readable than the digital one in low-light conditions, but my old clock was still more readable. On the other hand, the old clock was ugly, huge, and gave far less information on its display.
On the whole, I’m happy with this alarm+UPS solution.
Computing of the Future
Back in 1954, Popular Mechanics ran a story about computing of the future. At that time a “home computer” was a far-off concept. Attached below is the projection of what a home computer in 2004 would look like.
I have several comments. First, what’s with the steering wheel? Also, I find this especially amusing: “With teletype interface and the Fortran language, the computer will be easy to use.”
Read on for more…

Best Quote of the Day
Defense is a lot broader than swaggering around saying you’re going to kick Saddam’s butt.
— Howard Dean at a debate with Richard Perle
Who is the real communist, comrade Gates?
Bill gates recently gave an interview in which he said that people that opposed software patents, or other tightening of intellectual property laws, are “communists”.
Richard M. Stallman has an amusing and elightening article, Bill Gates and other communists, in response.
Favorite juicy quote:
Thanks to Mr. Gates, we now know that an open Internet with protocols anyone can implement is communism; it was set up by that famous communist agent, the U.S. Department of Defense.
Yesterday’s Reading
It appears some local DSL providers are blocking Vonage simply because Vonage is a competitor to their own phone service.
Pictures are banned in Chicago’s newest park because taking photographs of a sculpture there is being deemed illegal reproduction of a copyrighted work.
TurboTax and TaxCut Are Crap
I do my taxes on my computer every year.
For the past two years, I have used TaxCut. This year, I had several unpleasant surprises:
1. It would crash hard at a particular screen in the program, every time. I finally figured out how to skip that screen. Fortunately, it didn’t pertain to me.
2. It refused to let me file because it didn’t have charitable giving ready to go yet, saying I should run the automatic update procedure. Guess what — I already did, and it installed its latest updates.
3. The state tax program for Kansas is available for Windows, but not yet for Mac. So I can’t even try to file my state taxes.
Fast and easy? I think not.
I originally switched from TurboTax because:
1. It was more expensive than TaxCut and provided no extra features
2. TurboTax would charge $10 more simply for the privilege of getting the same product for Mac
3. TurboTax tried to write to your boot sector as part of its copy-protection scheme, often rendering machines unbootable.
4. TurboTax tried to restrict how many returns one could prepare with it, even though there was no technical reason for that.
5. Intuit, the makers of TurboTax, have been known to intentionally break features of their software such as Quicken simply to force people to upgrade.
So it seems there is no non-crappy choice out there. I could go with TaxCut and get a product that is apparently unintentionally crappy. Or I could go with TurboTax, and give my dollars to a company that intentionally handicaps their software.
Either way, I’m displeased.
Perhaps I should get a slide rule and quill pen and do things the old fashioned way.
Don’t Live Here
Cliff has a great photo or two in his “why you don’t want to live in Nebraska” series. I never posted photos from our recent Kansas ice storm, so I figured I should show you why you don’t want to live in Kansas, either. These are from our recent ice storm:
First up, the view from our porch:

Read on for more…
Kansas grass is unusually hearty:

Our driveway, after I had cleared all the debris from it:

The side of our house. That thing you see under the icy branches is, ironically, our air conditioner.

We weren’t the only ones with trouble. That power line in the background is holding up that big branch.

Today’s Reading
Federal scientists told to alter findings (LA Times, via Slashdot)
SCO slammed for lack of evidence… Judge calls SCO’s arguments “puzzling”. Juicy quote: “There’s very little that can be more disastrous to your case than an angry federal judge.”
The Grand Experiment — a blog based solely on a high-paying Google keyword: asbestos. Apparently people are paying as high as $100 for hits on “asbestos”. I wonder if mentioning “asbestos” many times in this story will get me any hot asbestos clicks. Probably not. The adwords on here have been more amusing than anything.
Thoughts on Amtrak
The White House budget proposal is seeking bankruptcy for Amtrak, the only intercity passenger rail service in the United States. Amtrak is vital to our country. It provides the only passenger transportation option through many parts of rural America, and the only reasonably-priced option in many others that have only non-competitive air options to choose from. It is also vital for those that can’t drive. Finally, Amtrak operates the vital commuter rail service in the Northeast Corridor (NEC), which extends from Boston to Washington, D.C. Amtrak is the only way for many people to get to work each day or to go on business trips, due to the highly congested roads in the region.
Here’s a little history on Amtrak.
Railroads were a vital part of the nation’s expansion beginning in the late 1800s. Government programs encouraged the private railroads to expand by giving them large amounts of land (that they could then sell at profit) and through other means. Railroads were vital carriers of people and freight clear through the 1950s, and remain vital carriers of freight today. In urban areas, railroads also provide the most effective way to move large numbers of people.
One thing many people don’t know is that passenger operations almost never made a profit for the railroads.
After World War II ended, there was a heavy push towards the automobile from many areas. The federal government subsidized the building of thousands of miles of new highways and other automobile infrastructure. Also at that time, governments at all levels were spending money to support air travel. Meanwhile, the railroads had been taxed to their limit during the war effort, and every part of their infrastructure was in serious disrepair. They did not receive federal assistance.
Remember that railroads were all private companies, such as Union Pacific and New York Central. They were facing serious financial problems and began attempts to discontinue the money-losing passenger service. However, back at that time, many industries — including railroads — were “regulated industries”. They couldn’t make any major changes without government approval, and the government wouldn’t let them cancel passenger service. The inevitable result was a decline in service quality as corners were cut with staffing, maintenance, etc.
Finally, in 1971, matters came to a head. The federal government agreed to let the private railroads stop offering passenger service if the railroads gave their passenger equipment and employees to a new government-backed corporation — Amtrak. Amtrak would receive government subsidies to continue providing vital passenger rail service. The day Amtrak began, they inherited all the neglected equipment from the private railroad companies, and immediately canceled many routes due to lack of funds.
Amtrak has more or less limped along until the present day. It has had a string of problems, including never once receiving adequate funding from Congress, several incompetant CEOs (these are appointed by the White House and Congress), and its own difficult start.
Today, Amtrak continues to limp along. It received $1.2 billion last year, instead of the $1.8 billion it asked for. That means that, once again, corners have to be cut to get by. In 2002, the federal government provided $32 billion in subsidies for roads, $14 billion in subsidies for air travel, and less than $1 billion for Amtrak.
This year, the Bush administration is proposing about $360 million for Amtrak. This is a number that will force Amtrak into bankruptcy. They view the $1 billion or so that Amtrak gets each year as a “subsidy”, but the $32 billion spent on roads as an investment.
Strangely, the administration believes that forcing an Amtrak bankruptcy is a good thing and that private companies will be eager to operate rail services.
Unfortunately, they have forgotten the reason Amtrak exists in the first place.
Also, they have forgotten that almost no passenger transportation methods anywhere in the world can make a profit. Billions of dollars of federal, state, and local money support air travel — building airports, paving runways, operating traffic control systems. Railroads must pay for all of their infrastructure by themselves.
In reality, Amtrak is a true bargain.