I clicked on a headline for an article titled Firefox news readers run the gamut. Sounded interesting; I’m not particularly happy with slrn, but I use it because there’s nothing better.

I thought it would be odd that there would be more than one newsreader, and one integrated into Firefox no less. So I was curious and clicked the link.

Surprise — it wasn’t talking about news readers at all, but rather RSS aggregators.

GRRR.

A news reader should be for *Usenet*.

Speaking of which, RSS is superflous. One could use NNTP to publish headlines and summaries anyway, and not require the development of a whole slew of software for yet another annoying protocol.

Remember Y2K? Here’s an interesting story looking back on it: The Surprising Legacy of Y2K.

Found a great collection of little utilities: Form Bookmarklets. These are little things you can drag to your Firefox bookmark toolbar and give you one-click access to various little utilities.

My two favorites can toggle the state of all checkboxes on a page, or convert a POST form into a (bookmarkable) GET one.

Here is a simple example illustrating the coolness of Darcs over, say, Arch or anything else.

I’ve converted 24 public projects from Subversion or Arch to Darcs, preserving full history, as I mentioned earlier. It all went very smoothly. I’m even maintaining my Arch utilities in darcs :-)

Some small observations:

• Committing early and often is good.
• When a commit is virtually instantaneous, it’s easy to commit early and often. A commit in darcs doesn’t require it to hit the network.
• Branching is a frequent need and is done far to infrequently. But Darcs makes it even easier than Arch. Very nice.

I’ve been using Arch/tla/baz for quite awhile now; I switched from Subversion awhile back. But they’ve got a bunch of things that annoy me. Offline working is clumsy. Performace is bad, and to make it even approach decent, you have to dedicate a huge amount of space to a revision library cache. Commands, even with baz, are clumsy and require an inordinate amount of typing. It’s still better than CVS and SVN, with its merging and all, but still — it’s been annoying.

Enter darcs. I’ve been keeping an eye on it for awhile, and it looks like it’s become quite stable, useful, and fast recently. I tried it out awhile back, and it wasn’t really “there” yet. I tried it out again this week, and must say that darcs is great. I’m converting all my Arch and Subversion stuff to Darcs.

The thing that really impressed me is this Darcs mirror of the Linux kernel Bitkeeper repository. Darcs is fast over this, far nicer than Arch was (I did a similar project in Arch awhile back), and it uses less than 1GB of disk space for a complete mirror.

Oh, and I wrote a 100-line Haskell program to convert Arch stuff to Darcs: arch2darcs. You can see an example of a converted repository at here. There’s also a program called Tailor (I didn’t write this one) that does a bidirectional sync between Darcs and CVS or Subversion. Sweet.

I’m happily converting the rest of my Arch and SVN stuff to Darcs today. Woohoo.