<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Registrar Dynadot Conspires to Help Take Down Wikileaks?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://changelog.complete.org/archives/685-registrar-dynadot-conspires-to-help-take-down-wikileaks/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://changelog.complete.org/archives/685-registrar-dynadot-conspires-to-help-take-down-wikileaks</link>
	<description>Viewpoints on technology, society, and government</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 10:34:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Goerzen</title>
		<link>http://changelog.complete.org/archives/685-registrar-dynadot-conspires-to-help-take-down-wikileaks/comment-page-1#comment-1982</link>
		<dc:creator>John Goerzen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://changelog2.complete.org/archives/685-registrar-dynadot-conspires-to-help-take-down-wikileaks.html#comment-1982</guid>
		<description>They are, and that&#039;s why I&#039;m still there.

Gandi doesn&#039;t provide whois privacy, which is annoying.  Companies that do -- if you find a good one like register4less -- will still keep your name as the owner.  But your address and phone number will be replaced with a service that the registrar operates, in which they typically forward anything non-spammy to you and trash the rest.  It is annoying to get physical junk mail just because I own a domain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are, and that&#8217;s why I&#8217;m still there.</p>
<p>Gandi doesn&#8217;t provide whois privacy, which is annoying.  Companies that do &#8212; if you find a good one like register4less &#8212; will still keep your name as the owner.  But your address and phone number will be replaced with a service that the registrar operates, in which they typically forward anything non-spammy to you and trash the rest.  It is annoying to get physical junk mail just because I own a domain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nona</title>
		<link>http://changelog.complete.org/archives/685-registrar-dynadot-conspires-to-help-take-down-wikileaks/comment-page-1#comment-1981</link>
		<dc:creator>nona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://changelog2.complete.org/archives/685-registrar-dynadot-conspires-to-help-take-down-wikileaks.html#comment-1981</guid>
		<description>Out of curiousity: why were you thinking of moving away from Gandi? I always thought their &quot;Terms and Conditions&quot; to be very good (or has there been a change recently?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Out of curiousity: why were you thinking of moving away from Gandi? I always thought their &#8220;Terms and Conditions&#8221; to be very good (or has there been a change recently?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Mark</title>
		<link>http://changelog.complete.org/archives/685-registrar-dynadot-conspires-to-help-take-down-wikileaks/comment-page-1#comment-1980</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 01:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://changelog2.complete.org/archives/685-registrar-dynadot-conspires-to-help-take-down-wikileaks.html#comment-1980</guid>
		<description>Its odd that they attacked the DNS and did not affect the server in the US (vs the ones in other countries). So the DNS company can &#039;take hostage&#039; your DNS records? Its seems like their needs to be a &#039;Pirate party&#039; DNS so that folks can know that this type of website can not be beholden to DNS companies that don&#039;t want to challenge a takedown request even a little and keep the legal process hidden despite their claim to the contrary. I guess these cases are tests that digital free speech advocates need to go through and learn how to &#039;route around&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its odd that they attacked the DNS and did not affect the server in the US (vs the ones in other countries). So the DNS company can &#8216;take hostage&#8217; your DNS records? Its seems like their needs to be a &#8216;Pirate party&#8217; DNS so that folks can know that this type of website can not be beholden to DNS companies that don&#8217;t want to challenge a takedown request even a little and keep the legal process hidden despite their claim to the contrary. I guess these cases are tests that digital free speech advocates need to go through and learn how to &#8216;route around&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
