<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Re-Examining Darcs &amp; Mercurial</title>
	<atom:link href="http://changelog.complete.org/archives/588-re-examining-darcs-mercurial/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://changelog.complete.org/archives/588-re-examining-darcs-mercurial</link>
	<description>Viewpoints on technology, society, and government</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 02:23:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Stosberg</title>
		<link>http://changelog.complete.org/archives/588-re-examining-darcs-mercurial/comment-page-1#comment-1975</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Stosberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 23:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://changelog2.complete.org/archives/588-re-examining-darcs-mercurial.html#comment-1975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After significant testing with pre-releases of Darcs 2, I&#039;ve found that the &quot;hang&quot; problems are generally solved, as well as problems with &quot;--partial&quot; repositories, and other general improvements like making backup files in more conflict cases, improved SSH support, and generally better feedback when things do go wrong. 

Pre-release binaries are available on the wiki for testing.

Also, I think the open bug count, currently about 75, along with the high number of automated tests for project are goods signs over the overall quality that darcs currently has.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After significant testing with pre-releases of Darcs 2, I&#8217;ve found that the &#8220;hang&#8221; problems are generally solved, as well as problems with &#8220;&#8211;partial&#8221; repositories, and other general improvements like making backup files in more conflict cases, improved SSH support, and generally better feedback when things do go wrong. </p>
<p>Pre-release binaries are available on the wiki for testing.</p>
<p>Also, I think the open bug count, currently about 75, along with the high number of automated tests for project are goods signs over the overall quality that darcs currently has.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Glick</title>
		<link>http://changelog.complete.org/archives/588-re-examining-darcs-mercurial/comment-page-1#comment-1963</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Glick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 18:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://changelog2.complete.org/archives/588-re-examining-darcs-mercurial.html#comment-1963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hg backout -m 71]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hg backout -m 71</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hm</title>
		<link>http://changelog.complete.org/archives/588-re-examining-darcs-mercurial/comment-page-1#comment-1745</link>
		<dc:creator>hm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 16:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://changelog2.complete.org/archives/588-re-examining-darcs-mercurial.html#comment-1745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Darcs has a few trick that hg can&#039;t match. Like undoing a specific patch. Say you are at version 100 and want to remove the changes from version 70 to 71. Tricky with hg and many other scm&#039;s. With darcs, you issue two commands: darcs rollback -p &quot;Version70&quot;; darcs revert. Done!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darcs has a few trick that hg can&#8217;t match. Like undoing a specific patch. Say you are at version 100 and want to remove the changes from version 70 to 71. Tricky with hg and many other scm&#8217;s. With darcs, you issue two commands: darcs rollback -p &#8220;Version70&#8243;; darcs revert. Done!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samuel Bronson</title>
		<link>http://changelog.complete.org/archives/588-re-examining-darcs-mercurial/comment-page-1#comment-1612</link>
		<dc:creator>Samuel Bronson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 02:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://changelog2.complete.org/archives/588-re-examining-darcs-mercurial.html#comment-1612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Darcs doesn&#039;t really have very good windows support either... (says the happy darcs user)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darcs doesn&#8217;t really have very good windows support either&#8230; (says the happy darcs user)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin A'Lee</title>
		<link>http://changelog.complete.org/archives/588-re-examining-darcs-mercurial/comment-page-1#comment-1444</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin A'Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 14:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://changelog2.complete.org/archives/588-re-examining-darcs-mercurial.html#comment-1444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently switched from Darcs to Mercurial (for [url=http://ikiwiki.info/]Ikiwiki[/url], which doesn&#039;t yet support Darcs). I&#039;ve found I&#039;m having to spend a lot more time merging when I don&#039;t &#039;hg up&#039; before committing. Darcs handles it without a problem.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently switched from Darcs to Mercurial (for [url=http://ikiwiki.info/]Ikiwiki[/url], which doesn&#8217;t yet support Darcs). I&#8217;ve found I&#8217;m having to spend a lot more time merging when I don&#8217;t &#8216;hg up&#8217; before committing. Darcs handles it without a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Goerzen</title>
		<link>http://changelog.complete.org/archives/588-re-examining-darcs-mercurial/comment-page-1#comment-1413</link>
		<dc:creator>John Goerzen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 18:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://changelog2.complete.org/archives/588-re-examining-darcs-mercurial.html#comment-1413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[See the story and comments here: [url]http://changelog.complete.org/posts/528-Whose-Distributed-VCS-Is-The-Most-Distributed.html[/url]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See the story and comments here: [url]http://changelog.complete.org/posts/528-Whose-Distributed-VCS-Is-The-Most-Distributed.html[/url]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Goerzen</title>
		<link>http://changelog.complete.org/archives/588-re-examining-darcs-mercurial/comment-page-1#comment-1412</link>
		<dc:creator>John Goerzen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 18:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://changelog2.complete.org/archives/588-re-examining-darcs-mercurial.html#comment-1412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s often more convenient to use export/import instead of push/pull.  That way, contributors don&#039;t have to have commit access to my repos, and they also don&#039;t have to publish theirs on the web.  bundle/unbundle would work too, but isn&#039;t as easy for reading diffs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s often more convenient to use export/import instead of push/pull.  That way, contributors don&#8217;t have to have commit access to my repos, and they also don&#8217;t have to publish theirs on the web.  bundle/unbundle would work too, but isn&#8217;t as easy for reading diffs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pachi</title>
		<link>http://changelog.complete.org/archives/588-re-examining-darcs-mercurial/comment-page-1#comment-1411</link>
		<dc:creator>pachi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://changelog2.complete.org/archives/588-re-examining-darcs-mercurial.html#comment-1411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Any special reason to use export/import instead of the more usual push/pull or even bundle to move changesets from one repo to another one?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any special reason to use export/import instead of the more usual push/pull or even bundle to move changesets from one repo to another one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jelmer Vernooij</title>
		<link>http://changelog.complete.org/archives/588-re-examining-darcs-mercurial/comment-page-1#comment-1410</link>
		<dc:creator>Jelmer Vernooij</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://changelog2.complete.org/archives/588-re-examining-darcs-mercurial.html#comment-1410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just out of curiosity, what behaviour of bzr do you find strange?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just out of curiosity, what behaviour of bzr do you find strange?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
