Assasinate Saddam; take out his doubles, if need be. A hundred doubles dead is a whole lot better than a hundred thousand civilians, IMHO–I’d still prefer having just one person dead, though.

It’s also interesting to note that the people who wage wars these days don’t directly join the wars they wage. How convenient, eh?

(An entry in my quasi-blog expresses much of my sentiment; pardon the shameless plug: `Of Bush-tards and Retards’)

I don’t think he ever intended to listen to anyone’s protest in the first place; it was probably just all for show.

I think that is right on. I suspected from the beginning that the maneuvers at the UN were solely to gain a tactical advantage, and that if they said No, that Bush would proceed anyway. It is interesting to note that, as far as anyone can tell right now, a majority of the citizens in each and every country in the “coallition” are opposed to their government’s involvement.

Because I don’t think he ever intended to listen to anyone’s protest in the first place; it was probably just all for show. By extrapolation, I’d say Dubya’s more interested in taking out any candidatory world power than `fighting for peace’.

They say that fighting for peace is like screwing for virginity.

I say Bush is a cowboy; one with his d*** stuck inside his horse’s a**.

And please; excuse the profanity.